Acute and Critical Care

Case Reports

Sedation with Dexmedetomidine during Tracheostomy in Severe Tracheal Stenotic Patients: Injung Jun, Kye Min Kim, Sang Seok Lee, Byung Hoon Yoo, Yoo Yong Lee, Yun Hee Lim, Se Jin Song, Mun Cheol Kim; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2013;28(4):314-317.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2013.28.4.314

2,579 View
27 Download
2 Crossref

In patients with severely compromised airways, a tracheostomy is usually performed under local anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine can be a better choice of sedative for such patients because it causes minimal respiratory depression. We report two cases of patients with severe stenosis of the airways who underwent sedation with dexmedetomidine during tracheostomy under local anesthesia. In the first case, recurrent laryngeal cancer caused laryngeal stenosis, and the narrowest laryngeal width was less than 3 mm. In the second case, the tracheostomy opening site was narrowed to a diameter of 3.4 mm in a patient with a history of total laryngectomy. For both patients, sedation was induced by dexmedetomidine infusion and the tracheostomy was performed successfully under local anesthesia without any events. Dexmedetomidine seems to be an effective and safe sedative for tracheostomies in patients with critical airways. The management and implications of sedation with dexmedetomidine in the patients with severe stenotic airways are discussed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Dexmedetomidine and emergency front of neck access for acute stridor in advanced laryngeal carcinoma: Anesthetic challenges
Neelakshi Koul, Uma Hariharan, Amit Kumar, Nidhi Yadav, VijayKumar Nagpal
Journal of Indian College of Anaesthesiologists.2022; 1(1): 30. CrossRef
Comment contrôler les voies aériennes en présence de masses cervicomédiastinales ?
Fabien Espitalier, Marc Laffon
Le Praticien en Anesthésie Réanimation.2015; 19(4): 172. CrossRef

Continuous Infusion of Ketamine in Mechanically Ventilated Patient in Septic Shock with Status Asthmaticus: Bon Nyeo Koo, Shin Ok Koh, Sung Yong Park, Jae Kwang Shim, Sung Sik Chon; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2000;15(2):108-112.

1,952 View
42 Download

Abstract PDF: Ketamine is well known for its analgesic, bronchodilating and sympathetic stimulating effect. Hence, it has been widely used for induction of patients with hypotension or asthma and also for analgesic and sedating purposes in the ICU. We presented a 62 year old female patient with ventilator support in septic shock with refractory asthma whom we managed successfully with continuous intravenous infusion of ketamine postoperatively in the ICU. The patient had a history of asthma but had been asymptomatic recently and was scheduled for an emergent explo-laparotomy under the diagnosis of acute panperitonitis. Before the induction of anesthesia, the patient was in septic shock but no wheezing could be auscultated. After the induction of general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation, wheezing was apparent in both lung fields with a high peak inspiratory pressure. Inotropics, vasopressors and bronchodilators were promptly instituted without any improvement of asthma and the patient had to be transferred to the ICU with intubated after the operation. Clinical symptoms of asthma continued throughout the first day despite using bronchodilators under mechanical ventilation but, after starting the IV infusion of ketamine, there were decrease in the peak inspiratory pressure and wheezing with a subsequent improvement in the arterial blood gas analysis findings. We could also achieve considerable analgesic and sedating effect without any decrease in the blood pressure. The patient's general physical status improved and weaning with extubation was successfully done on the 21st day and was transferred to the general ward on the 28th day.

Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of the Efficacy between Ketamine and Morphine on Sedation and Analgesia in Patients with Mechanical Ventilation: Tae Hyung Kim, Chae Man Lim, Tae Sun Shim, Sang Do Lee, Woo Sung Kim, Dong Soon Kim, Won Dong Kim, Younsuck Koh; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2000;15(2):82-87.

3,360 View
66 Download

Abstract PDF: BACKGROUND
While the combination therapy of morphine and benzodiazepine has been recommended as a standard therapy for sedation and analgesia in patients with mechanical ventilation, morphine can suppress respiratory center, and also decrease blood pressure and bowel movement. Because ketamine has analgesic and sedative effects compatible to morphine without depression of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems in addition to the preservation of bowel activity, ketamine may substitute morphine. However, it has not well known such potential advantages of ketamine in patients with mechanical ventilation.
METHODS
Thirty eight patients (male:female=30:8, age=62.6 +/- 11.7 years) with mechanical ventilation were randomized as ketamine and morphine group (n=21 vs. n=17). There was no significant differences in sex, age and APACHE III score at the initiation of mechanical ventilation (ketamine group, morphine group: 79.4 +/- 2.0, 82.0 +/- 20.6). The study duration was 24 h after drug administration and minimum dose, which maintains ventilator-patient synchrony or the status of Ramsay score 3, was used. Ramsay sedation score, hemodynamic variables, respiratory and arterial blood gas variables, and bowel sound were measured at every 4 h. Arterial blood gas analysis was checked at 0, 4, and 24 h.
RESULTS
1) There were no significant differences in Ramsay sedation score and other hemodynamic, respiratory, and arterial blood gas variables in each group. The dose of combined midazolam was not different between two groups (ketamine vs. morphine; 52.1 +/- 11.9 vs. 46.7 +/- 15.1 mg/d; p=0.23). 2) The cases with decreased mean arterial pressure over 25% of the baseline shortly after the drug administration less frequently observed in ketamine group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (n=2, 9.5% vs. n=5, 29.4%; p=0.12). 3) Bowel movement reduction at 4 h after the drug administration was less in ketamine group (n=1, 4.8% vs. n=6, 35.3%, p=0.03). The difference was not observed at 8 h. 4) Cost of the drug for 24 h was more expensive in ketamine group (dose & cost; 688 506 mg/d & 25,891 7,743 won vs. 40 +/- 18 mg/d, 15,814 +/- 4,853 won; p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Considering the advantages in the hemodynamics and bowel movement, ketamine may substitute morphine for the sedation of patients with mechanical ventilation, if indicated.

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search